Remarkably, these brands previously did not test their products on animals and had the leaping bunny logo on them. We’ve never tested our products on animals. This means you can be sure that our products have not been tested on animals for cosmetic reasons. Our products are tested on YES TO employees, friends and family,but never (ever) on animals. Andalou Naturals: What Andalou Naturals says about animal testing: Andalou Naturals shares your concern that cosmetics and personal care products should not be tested on animals. Our company policy clearly states that we – DO NOT and WILL NOT TEST our products or ingredients on animals, nor have we asked or allowed others to do so, on our behalf. Jart: All Dr Jart skin care products have been dermatologist tested and are claimed to be cruelty free, which means that none of the products have been tested on animals. MUA Cosmetics: We are pleased to confirm that our MUA products and their ingredients are not tested on animals. Inglot: The cosmetics from this brand are not tested on animals. Marks and Spencer: All Marks and Spencer products are guaranteed to not be tested on animals. We do not test our products or ingredients on animals, nor do we ask others to do so for us. Laura Mercier: We do not, nor have we ever, tested our products on animals. We do not test our products on animals, nor do we allow others to test on our behalf. Additionally, we require our suppliers to certify that the raw materials used in the manufacture of our products are not tested on animals.
Consumers and manufacturers sometimes ask about the use of animals for testing cosmetics. The following information addresses the legal requirement for cosmetic safety and FDA policy on developing alternative methods. The FD&C Act does not specifically require the use of animals in testing cosmetics for safety, nor does the Act subject cosmetics to FDA premarket approval. However, the agency has consistently advised cosmetic manufacturers to employ whatever testing is appropriate and effective for substantiating the safety of their products. Moreover, in all cases where animal testing is used, FDA advocates that research and testing derive the maximum amount of useful scientific information from the minimum number of animals and employ the most humane methods available within the limits of scientific capability. FDA supports the development and use of alternatives to whole-animal testing as well as adherence to the most humane methods available within the limits of scientific capability when animals are used for testing the safety of cosmetic products.
In search of the best cruelty free drugstore makeup and beauty products not tested on animals, what better place to look than the aisles of the drugstore where some of our most beloved and go-to products await. Drugstore Brands That DO Test on Animals: L’Oreal does test on animals. Maybelline does test on animals. Neutrogena does test on animals. Revlon – Revlon does 3rd party testing on animals (selling in China) – Editor’s Note: 2/2014 – they have pulled out of China for financial reasons – waiting for confirmation that they are free of animal testing. Almay – Almay is owned by Revlon and does 3rd party testing (selling in China) Editor’s Note: 2/2014 – they have pulled out of China for financial reasons – waiting for confirmation that they are free of animal testing. Drugstore Brands That DO NOT Test on Animals: (Note: Burt’s Bees is owned by Clorox – a company that tests on animals – the Burt’s Bees line is cruelty free, but some will choose to avoid the brand because of the parent company.
Testing cosmetics on animals is a type of animal testing used to test the safety and hypoallergenic properties of products for use by humans. Cosmetic animal testing is banned in the European Union , India , Israel ,   and Norway . Using animal testing in the development of cosmetics may involve testing either a finished product or the individual ingredients of a finished product on animals, often rabbits , but also mice , rats , and other animals.  Norway banned cosmetics animal testing the same time as the EU. Turkey "banned any animal testing for cosmetic products that have already been introduced to the market."  Animal testing on cosmetics or their ingredients was banned in the UK in 1998. Brazil's legislation will vote on a nationwide animal testing for cosmetics ban by the end of March 2014. Congress which would ban cosmetic testing on animals and eventually would ban the sale of cosmetics tested on animals. China passed a law on 30 June 2014 to ban the requirement of animal testing on cosmetics in China. Methods of testing cosmetics on animals include many different tests that are categorized differently based on which areas the cosmetics will be used for. Draize test: This is a method of testing that may cause irritation or corrosion to the skin or eye on animals (e.g. Procedures of Animal Testing[ edit ]
More Than a Makeup Trend: New Survey Shows 72 percent of Americans Oppose Testing Cosmetics Products on Animals. Cruelty-free cosmetics and personal care products have become solidly mainstream, and consumers and lawmakers are increasingly skeptical of companies that continue to test on animals. In PCRM’s survey, 72 percent of respondents agreed that testing cosmetics on animals is unethical (Fig. An even higher percentage—78 percent—of respondents agreed that the development of alternatives to animal testing for cosmetics testing is important (Fig. Sixty-one percent of respondents said that cosmetics and personal care product companies should not be allowed to test products on animals (Fig. These new data, when compared with the results of older opinion polls, demonstrate a significant shift in opinion about animal testing of cosmetics and personal care products over the last decade. The majority of Americans believe that cosmetics and personal care products on animals is unethical, and a large and increasing percentage believe such testing should not be allowed. Sixty-one percent of respondents were so opposed to animal testing of cosmetics and personal care products that they said companies should not be allowed to test their products on animals. In 2008, a survey by the Humane Research Council found that 40 percent of Americans had purchased products labeled as “not tested on animals” because of their concern for animals. Although the 2008 survey asked whether the respondent had actually purchased the products and PCRM’s asked how likely they would be to purchase cruelty-free products, the results suggest that consumers are increasingly inclined to purchase products not tested on animals. Testing cosmetics or personal care products on animals is inhumane or unethical. The development of alternatives to animal testing for cosmetics and personal care products is important.
Labs that use mice, rats, birds, reptiles and amphibians are exempted from the minimal protections under the Animal Welfare Act (AWA). Even animals that are protected under the AWA can be abused and tortured. And the law doesn’t require the use of valid alternatives to animals, even if they are available. According to the Humane Society, registration of a single pesticide requires more than 50 experiments and the use of as many as 12,000 animals. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. "Top Five Shocking Animal Experimentation Facts." Web Accessed March 3, 2015. "Animal Testing Is Bad Science: Point/Counterpoint." Web Accessed March 3, 2015. "Laws and Regulations | Animal Use in Research." Web Accessed March 3, 2015. "About Animal Testing." Web Accessed March 3, 2015. "Infographic: Ending Animal Testing For Cosmetics." Web Accessed March 2, 2015. "Science at any cost: The ineffectiveness and underenforcement of the Animal Welfare Act." Penn St. "The End of Animal Testing." The Humane Society of the United States, 2010. "Reduce, refine, replace: The failure of the three R's and the future of animal experimentation." U. Web Accessed March 20, 2015.
The brands below are grouped in one of the following categories: Brands That DO NOT Test on Animals, Brands That DO Test on Animals, and *Brands Whose Animal Testing Status is Unknown. IMPORTANT NOTE 1: If the company's site claims they do not test on animals but the brand is sold in mainland China from a physical location (i.e. IMPORTANT NOTE 2: If a brand is available only online, with no physical storefronts or warehousing in mainland China, they are exempt from the Chinese government's animal testing requirements. IMPORTANT NOTE 3: If an individual brand doesn't test on animals, but their parent company does test on animals, we do not penalize the individual brand.
You are here: Home » Makeup » Updated – Beauty Brands That Do Not Test On Animals (2016) Updated – Beauty Brands That Do Not Test On Animals (2016) My annual list of beauty brands that do not test on animals is finally here! The issue about which beauty brands that do not test on animals in 2016 shouldn’t even be here, because there have been some advances.
One such test: The Draize rabbit eye and skin test for irritation, where substances are placed in animals' eyes or directly on their skin to test for redness, ulcers, or irritation, explains Vicki Katrinak, spokeswoman for The Coalition for Consumer Information on Cosmetics. The good news is that many companies are opting for non-animal-testing methods, such as Epi Derm and Epi Skin, which are tests that use cultured, human-derived cells to test for skin irritation, says Guillermo. Choose products with a Leaping Bunny logo from The Coalition for Consumer Information on Cosmetics. You can use PETA's extensive searchable database of companies that do and do not test their products on animals. "In general, the only ones who still are doing tests on animals are companies that are developing new ingredients," she says.
In the 1930s more than a dozen women went blind because of Lash Lure, a mascara that was made with a chemical that could burn the skin. Today the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) oversees the safety of cosmetics, drugs, medical devices, and foods. Other federal agencies require safety tests for products that will be used in the home, workplace, and the environment. These agencies together with industry work to develop ways to get reliable drug and product safety data through non-animal tests or tests that minimize the number of animals needed .
We've got the details on five brands offering cruelty-free cosmetics and personal care products that are safe, natural, healthy and widely available. Decades after modern animal testing practices began, many companies began turning to more humane methods, and offering products not tested on animals. These five brands offer cruelty-free cosmetics and personal care products that are safe, natural, healthy and widely available, making it easy to avoid makeup that's tested on animals. Burt's Bees products are not only entirely free of petrochemicals, sulfates, parabens and phthalates but are never tested on animals. Everyday Minerals creates cosmetics that are organic, vegan, eco-friendly and never tested on animals. None of the products produced by Kiss My Face are tested on animals, and many are vegan. Kiss My Face, which began on an organic farm in New York, supports the Corporate Standard of Compassion for Animals (also known as the Leaping Bunny Organization ), and is committed to creating environmentally responsible products that are safe, natural and effective. Among the cosmetics not tested on animals offered by Kiss My Face are tinted moisturizers, organic shimmers and shines, lip balm and cheek color. Though now owned by L'Oreal, a company that does test on animals, The Body Shop maintains that its strict standards against animal testing have not been compromised. L'Oreal — which owns such brands as Garnier, Maybelline and Lancome — claims that it no longer tests finished products on animals and has recently funded technology that could reduce the need for animal testing in the future, but is not cruelty-free.
Many cosmetics companies misleadingly claim their products are ‘not tested on animals’ but are not so keen to admit that they still use animal-tested ingredients. Here is an overview that explains how to recognise the companies that try to give the impression they are cruelty-free, when they're not! More recently (in 2012) several previously cruelty-free companies (Caudalie, L’occitane, Yves Rocher) returned to testing on animals in order to sell their products in China and Russia – where they demand animal data. The second category are cosmetics companies that tend not to test on animals themselves but continue to buy, use and benefit financially from chemical ingredients that have recently been tested on animals by their suppliers. Most of them are very clever at deceiving the public with the claims they make about animal testing. This means that the company will not buy or use ingredients that have been tested on animals by themselves or their suppliers after a set date (e.g. This is the only method by which manufacturers can send a clear message to their suppliers and the rest of the industry that the company is not prepared to profit from animal tested ingredients. Most animal testing for cosmetics takes place on "new to the world" chemicals. You may be wondering why these companies are so keen to have access to new chemicals, especially when the majority of consumers are against animal testing for cosmetics? P&G and others are filling their products with all sorts of new chemical ingredients. These companies are taking a gamble on the fact that most consumers assume that cosmetics are no longer tested on animals or are unable to see through their cleverly worded ‘animal testing policies’. It's hard to believe but there are no laws to prevent companies from deliberately misleading consumers about their animal testing practises. Many cosmetic companies also add statements about how much they support and invest in the development of alternative methods of testing - which is a ploy to distract consumers from the fact that they also still test on animals. But they are not being completely honest because they do still buy and use 'new to the world' ingredients that have been tested on animals during their development. If these pages are still here – it means P&G still test on animals – we will remove this section only if they stop animal testing.
I just discovered your blog and love the fact that you feature cruelty-free products in here. I love Kats products and that they are cruelty free! Do you personally use products by brands that are owned by a company that aren’t cruelty free but the brand them self are? And most of their products are vegan as well, the ones that are not are listed on the FAQ on their website. Laura mercier is cruelty free, it states on their site, they also state some products are vegan, and some are not. I know that animal testing is required by law in China, but on their websites they say they are cruelty free (albeit, not entirely vegan). The animal tests performed in China are as cruel as any animal tests can be, and if a company finances those tests, they can’t be cruelty-free! They claim to be cruelty-free because the don’t test on animals here, but omit to say they do so in China. I’ve called the company nest to ask about their cruelty-free status and they say they are, but i’m suspect. They sell in mainland China and can’t be considered cruelty-free for that reason. Thank you for this information but I just want to inform the publisher, of this article, that Urban Decay Cosmetics is a cruelty-free company even though they were acquired by L’Oreal in 2012. However, you stated on this list that they DO test on animals…
What types of companies are on the "Don't Test" list? The list includes companies that make cosmetics, personal-care products, household-cleaning products, and other common household products. S., no law requires that these types of products be tested on animals, and companies can choose not to sell their products in countries such as China, where tests on animals are required for cosmetics and other products. The list does not include companies that manufacture only products that are required by law to be tested on animals (e.g., pharmaceuticals and garden chemicals). All companies that are included on PETA’s cruelty-free list have signed PETA’s statement of assurance or submitted a statement verifying that neither they nor their ingredient suppliers conduct, commission, or pay for any tests on animals for ingredients, formulations, or finished products. A company that claims not to test on animals but that doesn’t appear on PETA’s list may have eliminated tests on animals for finished products but not for ingredients. If you communicate with a company that claims to be cruelty-free but is not on our list, please ask for a statement in writing and send a copy of the statement to PETA. Some companies are not educated about or sensitive to the suffering of animals in the production of certain products that do not involve the actual slaughter of animals. Please contact PETA if you have any questions about the status of companies that are listed or if you know the address of a company that is not listed. Why are these companies included on the "Do Test" list? The following companies manufacture products that are tested on animals at some stage of development. Companies on this list may manufacture individual lines of products that have not been tested on animals.
S., Benefit Cosmetics products are available at the following locations: Benefit Cosmetics products are sold exclusively at Benefit Cosmetics.com, boutiques and licensed retail stores in the U. An order confirmation will appear as the final step in your order and you'll receive an email confirmation with an order number and brief summary of your fabulous new purchase! To cancel your order, simply log in to view your orders here and click the Cancel option. Make sure you are entering the credit card’s CVN and billing information correctly. Make sure your billing name, address and phone number matches that of the credit card used for payment. This authorization hold will be removed within 5 to 7 business days and the funds will be released back to your account so you can shop to your heart’s content! No, gorgeous, Benefit Cosmetics.com does not ship outside the United States. If you wish to return a product, please return within 30 days from the ship date for a refund on the purchase price, minus shipping, handling, gift wrap, and other charges. Complete the "Return form" enclosed in your original order and place it inside the return package. Pack and seal your return merchandise securely and include a copy of the original receipt, as well as an email and phone number where you can be contacted. If you have a specific allergy, please review the ingredients which are listed on the product page and contact your general practitioner to determine if a product is suitable for your skin. Sign up for e-mails at Benefit Cosmetics.com and we’ll treat you like family! Phone Request – call 1-800-781-2336 and request that your email be removed from the email list.
The good news is that finding out which products and brands don't test on animals is easy. Some tests are standard practice for such companies and brands, and other animal tests are carried out because of local laws in importing countries (such as China) that require all beauty products to be tested on animals before they are allowed to be sold in that country. The list below shows companies that use animal testing as well as particular brands that are tested on animals for any or all of the reasons we mention above:
What types of companies are on the "Don't Test" list? The list includes companies that make cosmetics, personal-care products, household-cleaning products, and other common household products. S., no law requires that these types of products be tested on animals, and companies can choose not to sell their products in countries such as China, where tests on animals are required for cosmetics and other products. The list does not include companies that manufacture only products that are required by law to be tested on animals (e.g., pharmaceuticals and garden chemicals). No specific laws exist regarding cruelty-free labeling of products, and companies may not have the same high standards as PETA when labeling their products. A company that claims not to test on animals but that doesn't appear on PETA's list may have eliminated tests on animals for finished products but not for ingredients. If you communicate with a company that claims to be cruelty-free but is not on our list, please ask for a statement in writing and send a copy of the statement to PETA. Why are these companies included on the "Do Test" list? The following companies manufacture products that are tested on animals at some stage of development. Companies on this list may manufacture individual lines of products that have not been tested on animals.
We hear you and we've been working to update the previous post Tiffany did in 2011 regarding Animal Testing. Our private label Sephora Collection and Sephora Originals (Hello Kitty, Kat Von D, Formula X, and Pantone) are cruelty free (meaning that the products have never been tested on animals). The only animal products we use are honey and beeswax in the Lip Honey.” If I buy something that is produced in Europe, where animal testing is banned or so I heard, but the company also sells the product in China, where animal testing is mandatory, has the product that actually ends up in my possession actually been tested on animals or not? Or to put it another way is it the finished product that gets shipped over to China and then tested or are they testing ingredients in China and then making the product? How are they able to sell in Europe and China given the conflicting legislation regarding animal testing? How can you claim that Sephora private label products are "cruelty free" and "have never been tested on animals"? If you want to sell in China, fine, but at least have the integrity to be honest your products. China only mandates testing on imported finished cosmetics that contain ingredients or combinations or from sources they have not verified as safe. That is how a cosmetics company can sell in China and be cruelty free. Remember - the same companies that "sell in China" also sell in Europe which has a very strict ban against animal testing at any and every level. By saying "China only mandates testing on imported finished cosmetics that contain ingredients or combinations or from sources they have not verified as safe.", are you ALSO publicly stating that every single ingredient in every Sephora product that is sold in China has INDEED BEEN VERIFIED as "safe" by China's animal testing standards? There are many, many of us who made the choice years ago (in my case 25 years ago) not to use products from companies that condone the painful treatment of animals.
Indicates that the company's products are strictly vegan (i.e., made without animal ingredients, such as milk and egg byproducts, slaughterhouse byproducts, sheep lanolin, honey, or beeswax). Indicates that the company's policies are in question. Also, to Sinead Hennigan, Carmen Paxton, and Adelaide from Canada for all their diligent help in helping check on the status of various companies on this list or the other one (the bad one). There are a lot of companies to keep track of and up with.